In another recent improper joinder case, a Houston federal district court found plausible claims for relief alleged against the adjuster, and remanded the case.  In Murray v. Allstate Veh. & Prop. Ins. Co., No. CV H-18-3411, 2018 WL 5634949 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2018) (slip op.), what makes the remand noteworthy is that the plaintiff did not file a motion to remand.  Rather, the court observed that even though the plaintiff had not moved to remand, it must still ensure its own subject-matter jurisdiction, even if it means remanding the case sua sponte.  The court then went on to conduct a standard improper joinder analysis, and found that although the complaint closely tracked the language of the Insurance Code and the DTPA, it also alleged specific acts of the adjuster that were sufficient to state a facially plausible cause of action, and thus overcame the improper joinder threshold, defeating diversity jurisdiction.

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.