Recently, a federal court in the Southern District of Texas determined the two-year statute of limitations barred an insured from bringing extra-contractual claims against the insurer.  In Painter Family Investments, LTD., L.L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyds, Syndicate 4242, 2011 WL 6755839 (S.D.Tex., Dec. 23, 2011), the insured’s property was damaged by Hurricane Dolly.  The insured had two separate policies issued by two separate insurers.  Both insurers addressed the claim but only one insurer was sued when the lawsuit arose.  The second insurer was not added until two years after its claim-decision letter to the insured was issued.  The court rejected the insured’s argument that the relation-back doctrine should apply because the suits did not involve the same series of events, transactions or occurrences.  The court also noted that the amended complaint naming the second insurer had been filed without leave of court and no leave had been requested as of the date of the opinion.  The court, therefore, dismissed the extra- contractual claims as barred by the statute of limitations.

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.